Monday, November 23, 2009

One Cut For 1Malaysia Attire

The cult of 1Malaysia has gone from billboards, a concept to now a reality, literally wrapped around your body!

It is literally embod(y)-ed onto the person now. The soon to be mandatory instruction to wear the official attire, i.e. the 1Malaysia attire, for official function seems to demote the official 'national' costume, supposedly the songkok and baju melayu and batik.

And looking at the sample, we hope that such grotesque looking and silly designs never see the light of day! If it did, then one must really rise above one's embarrassment and put on a great smile for the love of 1Malaysia I supposed.

With the mandatory 1Malaysia attire, it makes the BN fellos and all those forced to wear the 'official' attire like some window dressing mannequin in a reject shop!

Talk about diversity, blah2 and then you have a standard boring all look alike monotony!


Who's getting a Cut from this Cult Cut?

Does this one cut for 1Malaysia Attire really practical? Under previous PM, there wasn't any wawasan 2020 or Hadhari attire. The most visible sign of shifting slogan shouting is that big billboard building found along the Federal Highway, the junction that is a bottleneck, seems a coincidence that the jam there is right in from of the broadcasting building that displays a humongous symbol of the present leadership's style.

Used to be Wawasan 2020, now it's 1Malaysia.

So who is going to get a cut in making these official attire, which is another WASTE of taxpayer's money to make the 'official attire'? The same fellos who made the National Service uniform?

What will they think of next to force the 1Malaysia onto the landscape and being of BolehLand fellos.

Will it find its way imprinted in more intimate wear. That will surely make one really close to 1Malaysia right? And it will be the best form of publicity as it will be the last defence before one reaches their goal? What better way of remembering the last thing before one loses himself or herself entering the 'gate of heaven'!


There is nothing between me and my 1Malaysia sarong

Sunday, November 22, 2009

Any takers for personalised plate PUK I967?

So BolehLand is set to join other developed nations with personalised number plates.

And it will definitely be the season for corruption! Even the present tender system is subject to some form of 'corruption' as anyone who has requested for a choice number plate will have their stories to share how they paid 'over or under' the counter or somewhere else besides the mandatory tender price just to get their favourite single, double, triple or quadruple 'ong' '8' '3' '4' '5' depending on which number one considers as his lucky number.

Now with personalised number plate, the temptation of corruption will be even greater and the stakes even higher.

But why are we practicing a very unfair tender system where you get your number only if as the NST reported today, 'Drive with a personal plate', Nov 23, 2009, 'if you are willing to pay through your nose'!

This personalised plate further divide the rich and influential from the ordinary. Why are we trying to promote a society of 'inequality' on a public service where those who buy a car has to have a mandatory car number?

The reason given to 'make more money' for JPJ doesn't make sense. Why should they profit from a public service to the extent of being overtly capitalistic in the issuance of car number plates?

If it is about making the most money and squeezing it from the people, rich or those who can afford it, then the Registration and Immigration Department should also tender the serial number of birth certs, MyKad and Passport!

Such tendering should be curtailed or at least a maximum ceiling is set and then a 'lottery' selection be used if there are more than one vying for the same personal number plate.

This capitalist way of horse trading is only pampering to the rich. As if showing off their multi million Lexus or Ferraris is not good enough, they have to outdo each other with 'ongish' number plate.

If personalised numbers are allowed, will there be a 'banned' list. Say if someone wants 'Osama' or 'AHLONG', 'JESUS', ALAMAK or KORUP, FCUK, is it allowed?

If a certain political leader chooses BABI 4, or AHQUA 1, will he be given one? What about if the MCA leader likes 'BETRAYED 11', or DAP junior lim wants 'DAPCAT', or MOHA insists its 'ISA 1967' or a playboy likes the plate 'PUK 1967 or some lady likes 'CEE 4', can they get their personalised plate?

It's about time the public puts a stop to this nonsense money making scheme at the expense of those who can't afford. So much about the people feeling 1Malaysia when the distinction between the rich and poor, haves and haves not, the influential and ordinary, corrupt and clean are being sharply distinguished with such practices.

It sends the message that with money you can get buy anything you want in BolehLand. Just becoz it's practised everywhere doesn't mean it's a right thing to do. Are we trying to set another world record for paying the highest price beating even Hong Kong in wanting to be 'real different' and have a plate that reflects one ego and contradiction of 1Malaysia? The tender systems makes 1Malaysia, a 'People with Money First' 'Gets Preference Now' society.

Empathy for the Perpetrator?

Today's Sunday Star has an interesting write up by dzof azmi, (23 Nov 2009, SM3) When it's us against 'them' , where there is a need to emphatise with thieves than victim. The recent incident where a woman had killed a snatch thief has caused him to offer 'heartfelt condolences to both parties', the victim and the one that was killed, the thief.

While most feel, at least from the blogs he surveyed, that the victim didn't do anything wrong and the thief deserved what he got, he feels 'nobody emphatises with the snatch thief.'

Perhaps he has not been a victim of snatch thief and robberies that it's easy to pontificate on giving the 'crooks' a fair chance in the eyes of the law. But if one listens to the justification for robbers to carry out their crimes, the 'empathising' we suppose, are their actions justifiable?

Supposed the thief committed the act becoz he is hungry, does it mean he is morally right to go about robbing innocent victims who may not contribute to his hunger?

Perhaps it's the thief first attempt so it's ok to emphatise with him and if he was successful will it not lead him to commit bolder robberies.

If we transfer the empathy to the perpetrator who is a rapist then we should forgive the rapist is it?

Just as it's easy for the public to point a finger and even ask for blood making the public some seem to be no better than the thief itself, the reaction of the public for vengeance against thieves, robbers, rapists, kidnappers do not come about because the public do not seem to practise 'empathy.'

The vengeance is brought about by those who commit crime and think they have the power to intimidate, cause fear, hurt and death upon the innocent and get away with it. Leave it to the social psychologists and criminologist to do the emphatising. For victims, being made to feel 'helpless' and cornered switch off their 'rational or empathetic' nature when face to face with a thief. 'Fight or flight' option is not always easily discerned.

If Dzof has a child of a hit and run driver that nearly caused his death and now suffering because he has lost an organ, dzof might not make the victim or the parent seem as 'cold blooded murders seeking vengeance' for what the hit-and-run driver has done to the child.

Yes by all means, let the thief be treated 'fairly' under the law. But it does not mean that 'justice' has been fairly done for the crime he commits.

When we hear that the perpetrator is pleading on the grounds of 'insanity' temporarily or otherwise', it seems a foolproof defence to get away with the responsibility of having committed the act! And if we empathise with the thief for doing what he did because at that moment he was hit by 'temporary insanity' we should let that fello go I suppose? The same 'insanity' ruling should also apply to the victim that ended in the perpetrator's death.

But aren't many robberies, rape even murdering the victim or mat rempiting planned?

Yes, we need tolerance and understanding in the context of building a harmoniums society. But let's not mix these with acts of crime pehleaseeee.

The victims work their butt off to earn money to spend, buy whatever they need, their car or home or cash to spend. No amount of 'emphatising' will justify why these should be taken away from the victims by the thief. That fello is taking the easy way out to acquire his wealth, at the expense of others!

And if we 'emphatise' deep enough, we should then forgive Altantuya's murderers then, or those who died while in custody or fleeing in his own home from the robbers. Close to one's own experience, for being robbed four times or having a love one nearly killed by a hit and run driver, it is rather difficult to emphatise the 'noble' intention or action of those who committed the hurt towards me.

Should we also be equally empathetic to those who waste public funds, indulge in corruption. We should forgive all those who stole taxpayers money because we see from the point of view they need the money to support their lifestyle!

It's no excuse to commit a crime for those snatch thieves, rapists, kidnappers or those who cheat, steal and are sleek corrupt fellos.

Forgive and forget? If only we were machines. Those who commit crimes find it easier to forgive themselves for doing harm and forget the miseries they caused to their victims. Why?- because they continue to commit the next crime because they easily forgive and forget what they did!

If one is defending one's life or dignity while being threatened at that time, it's nonsensical to pause and exercise 'empathy' towards the perpetrator!

We agree we can't take the law into our own hands except perhaps those who enforce the law! But when in danger, we take all means to defend ourselves and most of us stop when we feel it is helpless to resist knowing you have a disadvantage. Just like the thief who intents to rob will take all means worse still with intention to kill if it needs to get away with his crime.

The reason the public is seeking vengeance and support the action of the victim, some making her the hero is because the law (the piece of paper where the statue is written and the enforcement agencies ensuring that the law is preserved) has failed to protect her. The thief had no disregard for the law or consequences if he is caught breaking it and he deliberately goes against breaking it.

Perhaps dzof never had any real life encounter with terror staring in dzof's eyes. But for those who have been robbed five times and a love one nearly died and without an organ because of the crime of the hit-and-run driver, it's difficult to 'emphatise' the perpetrators.

Crime should been made known to the perpetrators it does not pay and the only way is if the robber knows it does not pay to commit a crime, however way it turned out!

If this blog seem to misinterpret and got the intention of the author all misconstrued becoz of the absence of 'empathy' on why he wrote what he did, it's because the article does not 'emphatise' with the victims even if 'sympathy' is warranted!

Friday, November 20, 2009

This Weirdo Has Weird Notion of Language

Is culture solely defined by language alone? Does speaking any language really causes one to really lose one's identity? Ok this is a question for linguists and anthropologists to debate.

So I speakie ingrish, does it make me a baloney mad dog brit slob with a preference of fis n cips mate?

The Ministry of Education Ministers are all behaving like really uneducated brainless leaders. The weirdest is its Deputy who thinks that speaking English somehow is like committing a terrible sin in BolehLand.

If speaking English is weird, Politicians must be morons.

Sure 99% prefer to speak English in the private sector, the language they are comfortable than in Bahasa Melayu and which is an accepted lingua franca in diplomacy, science, finance, arts, literature, technology, information technology, telecommunication and so on.

While countries that do not have an English advantage is giving more priority to English - the Thais, Taiwanese, Chinese, Koreans and Japanese all aspiring to speak the language to earn respect in a global environment, BolehLand weird politicians want to set us back to the Jurassic era!

No, not here in BolehLand, we prefer to throw away the advantage we have and stick to only using Bahasa. It's really a stupid strategy to want to subsume English to BM. Can't there be two in coexistence? After all Chinese and Tamil are hotly defended and retained!

Go ahead and push BM to be an internationally accepted language, noone is against that.

But the government fellos all live in a brainless follow 1Leader mentality. If the next PM leans towards Mongolia, we might see Mongolian becoming on par with BM too right?

Can the Education fellos concentrate on designing a curriculum that reflect the realities than some BTN kind of curriculum!

Language is not going to be a unifying factor in BolehLand, so long the Constitution gives a race more rights and privileges over another. It will not unite the different groups so long as race based parties continue to adopt a divide and rule policy.

Language will not be a unifying factor simply because the national language seem to also be tied with championing only the cultural elements, rituals and even dress code associated with the national language.

Performing say a Chinese or Indian dance wearing a national dress also create issues! It constitutes a bastardisation of the culture associated with the national dress.

Already the ultra nationalist equate speaking English to adopting Western Culture. Are they trying to suggest that speaking in BM will encourage adoption of Asian, read Malay culture and values?

BolehLand has been taught and reminded that if one uses the national language, it is associated with the culture, practices, traditions of the race that speaks the language.

Even the use of the word 'Allah' is creating division! And to try and label those who speak English 'weird?' is really a joke!

And when the modern Malay generation have their own BM speak language, they are still labelled as weird and corruption of their roots blah2.

Nothing seems to please the proponents of BM. They still adopt a very narrow chauvinistic approach of promoting BM as a language of unity. If you speak it make sure you follow the practices and belief of the race that claims it their mother tongue, else you will be accused of corrupting it, committing sedition, weirdo and not patriotic.

It is an accepted fact that English has contributed to the growth of tis nation. BM can do so in the future too. But cannot both be given equal importance?

Let's hope the uneducated deputy education minister uses BM in international forum, speak that language in any of his communication. Then we can say who is the weirdo!

Lest the educated minister accuse this blogger of a weirdo blogging in english, i'd use the unity language to describe his weirdo observation. 'dia orang gila dan ganjil'
---------------------
Weird to use English at work
Deputy education minister Mohd Puad Zarkashi wants employees to speak Malay.
KUALA LUMPUR - MALAYSIA's deputy education minister said that speaking English in the workplace is 'weird' and harmful to the nation's culture and identity.
Datuk Mohd Puad Zarkashi said employees in the private sector used English 99 per cent of the time and should switch to Bahasa Malaysia in order to show pride in the national language, the New Straits Times reported.
'This also occurs in government- linked companies where we have this weird culture of people speaking to each other in English instead of the national language,' he said at the launch of a linguistics seminar.
'We are polluting our own culture and identity as a nation,' said Dr Puad, who is known for being vocal in his views and who has previously called on the government to give more prominence to the Malay language.
'It would be difficult to strengthen the position of Bahasa Malaysia if this culture continued,' he added, urging Malaysians to emulate the French, Japanese and Koreans, who stuck to their own language.
The New Straits Times said Dr Puad also criticised young people for using a mix of English and Bahasa Malaysia in SMS text messages and on the Internet. -- AFP
Mohd Puad Zarkashi -This Weirdo is no like speakie ingrish

Thursday, November 19, 2009

MCA is now 1UMCA

The MCA, supposedly 'ketuanan' and champion of the Chinese community, has just killed their Greater Unity Plan with the latest circus act their OTK has done. Sack the Boh-Liow gang from the Presidential Council to strengthen his grip on the party.

OTK's latest party cleansing at the top level is probably worse than sending those poor cretins to the abattoir, 'slaughtering' off key MCA leaders.

The difference in this 'slaughter' house is, some believe the khinzir's squeals before being electrocuted, it's their cry before they meet their end. For the sacked MCA leaders, they met their end and then shedded tears.

Wee, Chew, among nine dropped from MCA presidential council
KUALA LUMPUR (Nov 18, 2009) : The MCA Youth and Wanita chiefs were among nine leaders - all aligned to renegade vice-president Datuk Seri Liow Tiong Lai - dropped from the party presidential council today.
The nine are Youth chief Datuk Dr Wee Ka Siong (Deputy Education Minister), Wanita chief Datuk Paduka Chew Mei Fun (Deputy Women, Family and Community Development Minister), ex-organising secretary Yoo Wei How, ex-deputy organising secretary Gan Hong Su, ex-MCA Information chief Lee Wei Kiat, Deputy Higher Education Minister Dr Hou Kok Chung, Deputy Finance Minister Datuk Chor Chee Heung, Deputy Youth and Sports Minister Datuk Wee Jeck Seng and central committee (CC) member Wong Nai Chee.

The latest sacking makes a mockery of MCA's GUP and the plan must now be in tatters!

And this latest fiasco has even led to UMNO leaders now openly bringing shame upon the MCA.

No2 even said that "Umno may take on the role of helping the Chinese community if MCA continues to be embroiled in crisis, said its deputy president Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin" And the political infighting has even caused No2 to boldly say "If I were a Chinese, I would also not support the MCA."

Yes indeed, now 1MCA can change its name to 1UMCA, 1Umno Managing Chinese Affairs.

But there might not be truth in No2's statement that "it would be difficult for Barisan to win the support of the Chinese if the party continued to face a political crisis."

The Chinese community does not think that MCA is the factor or main factor for supporting the MCA. Being realists and practical fellos the Chinese people are not only in BolehLand but world over, they will support the team that will ensure their self or selfish preservation whichever one wants to look at it.

For the MCA to be intensfying their infighting and be in turmoil after meeting No1 and agreed on a pow wow, BolehLand is instead treated to a 'Wow, Sock and Pow' ring fight between the President and his council.

And OTK makes himself an MCP (male chauvinist pig than a commie) towards the women in MCA. Did a as the Chinese would say 'chow yow yee' (like a sack losing one's job) on Chew Mei Fun and then reappoint her as 'invited' council back into the presidential council. OTK really makes himself Orang Tak otaK (fello without brains) with this insulting decision! OTK's thinks his 'sar ho fun' offer will whet our Mei Fun's appetite.

With OTK seemingly on a 'purge' his MCA, perhaps there is reason for him to advocate for a 1MCA, yes more sounding like him creating his own 1MCA.

But there may be some good thing that may come out of the Malaysian Cracking-up Association. This may make BN a multi national one(1) Malaysia party that will still retain the present BN formula of who controls what and who holds the top positions and who decides the position of leaders of the other communities except the Malays.

The present MCA's putsch also exposes the further weakness of the MCA, their dread of 'clean' leaders who will earn the respect of other BN members as well as that of the Chinese community.

But it should not be surprising to anyone the action taken by the No1 of 1MCA. He has done just as the No1 of BN or Pakatan party does too. The No1 holds absolute power and his word is absolute. Those who oppose them have been sacked and their political career cast aside to the doldrums. It would be interesting if the same happens to those who have been given the 'abattoir' treatment.

Wednesday, November 18, 2009

BolehLand's Slip Sliding Away Corruption Index

Malaysia slides 9 places to 56th spot in 2009 Corruption Perceptions Index. Rest of story below

So much about local surveys to show increasing popularity, or was it a dip in the latest poll. More a jagoh kampung standard. It's the international perception and ranking that matter, particularly such issues like corruption and transparency. These have influence to investors as well as if BolehLand touts itself a modern 'poor'-gresive Muslim nation, such 'sinful' acts must surely be non existence if not minimal. Odd, southern neigbhour supposedly branded 'infidels' by their northern neighbour scored a 3rd! Goes to show there is no correlation that external symbols and show of 'holier-than-thou' reflects actual ground real life situations!


Another Long Term Ongoing Project?

The number of high profile cases that to the public at least smack on corruption seem not to interest the government or the MACC to be seen as being serious to bring the culprits to the book!

The government propaganda machine is screaming for blood over a religious leader being sponsored to perform a pilgrimage and demand an IMMEDIATE MACC response and investigation. But when some fello wearing the robe of justice was also sponsored - it seems ok, family fren-fren after all it's a goodwill sponsorship?

The steepest decline among ASEAN members! Hmmm Myanmar Generals must be laughing and snubbing BolehLand's advice to adopt democratic principles, human rights and blah, blah, blah.

Expect the political rulers to dismiss it as just another propaganda by foreign elements jealous of the successes achieved by the ruling government. Expect also to hear these foreign devils don't understand local culture to distinguish between donation, sponsor, acceptable kickback that is a norm than an exception. Remember such things considered 'corruption' is like ingrained and acceptable due to over 50 years of nil checks and convictions over such gifts and practices. Big fishes and sharks in the blue ocean are left untouched while the fries are netted to extinction!

As common BolehLand folks we hang our head in shame. What's the point of all those gleaming, shiny iron and steel skyscrapers, branded outlets and chic fashion if we can't smell the rot in our backyard. Worse we seem helpless to do anything and call such practices, a necessity and pre-requisite to get projects done and achieve 2020 status, never mind how much taxpayers money are being milked to achieve the vision.
_______________________

Malaysia slides 9 places to 56th spot in 2009 Corruption Perceptions Index
Wednesday, 18 November 2009
(The Edge) - Malaysia dropped nine places to 56th position out of 180 countries surveyed in the Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) 2009, the anti-corruption watchdog announced yesterday.

Malaysia’s decline from 47th spot in 2008 is the steepest among the Asean countries in the ranking this year, although it fares better than all member countries except Singapore (3rd) and Brunei (39th), which is participating for the first time.

In the latest survey, Malaysia scored 4.5 points out of 10, where 0 means highly corrupt, and 10 is the best possible score.

“A fall of 0.6 from 5.1 in 2008 to 4.5 in 2009 is alarming not only to the people of Malaysia but also the government of the day,” said Transparency International Malaysia (TI-M) president Datuk Paul Low at a press conference here to announce the survey results.

He attributed Malaysia’s poorer showing to the perception that there had been little progress in combating corruption and that political will was lacking in implementing effective anti-corruption measures.

“There are several examples in the survey period giving rise to grave concern,” said Low.

“They include no action being taken against parties implicated in tampering in the appointment of judges, the Port Klang Free Zone (PKFZ) fiasco, where the cost rose from an estimated RM1.1 billion to RM4.7 billion and a possible RM12.5 billion, and political crossovers particularly in Perak.”

However, Low noted that there are positive signs.

“The PKFZ fiasco is being actively and vigorously investigated; police reports have been made and suits have been taken against certain parties, and corrective measures have been taken,” Low said.

He further noted that Malaysia ratified the United Nations Convention Against Corruption in September 2008.

Integrity is a Key Result Area for the government, referring to the performance criteria introduced by Datuk Seri Najib Razak when he took over as prime minister in April 2009.

Also, the prime minister had formed a high-level task force to study and make recommendations for action to be taken on the Auditor-General’s 2008 Report, said Low.

The CPI ranks countries in terms of the degree to which corruption is perceived to exist among public officials and politicians. It is a composite index drawing on corruption-related data from expert and business surveys carried out by a variety of independent and reputable institutions, TI said.

New Zealand ranked No 1 in the CPI 2009 with a score of 9.4, followed by Denmark (9.3), and Singapore and Sweden in joint 3rd and 4th place with 9.2. In fifth spot was Switzerland (9.0).

“Fragile, unstable states that are scarred by war and ongoing conflict linger at the bottom of the index,” said the global anti-corruption coalition in a press statement released from its headquarters in Berlin. The worst performers are Somalia, with a score of 1.1, Afghanistan (1.3), Myanmar (1.4) and Sudan tied with Iraq (1.5).

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Of sense, sensibility and senility of ole Tun M

They say that when one ages, they may go senile. Some is unavoidable a natural thing that afflicts the aged due to illness setting in and faculties slowing down.

Some are deliberate, which means they exhibit signs of senility deliberately so they can be forgiven for uttering rubbish or common sense depending on which one choose to look at it.

The ole sage Tun M is the latter group, who makes statements that some construe as a sign of senility while others may think its just the old hard core self, his suppressed id exhibiting itself partly to cling on to past glories. His latest theory seem to suggest ole sage is afflicted a cunning form of senility with a grand delusion that he is still running the country by running it down or running his own battles.

Sometimes his remarks may also be a reflection of some unfulfilled desires, the wish lists as you would say, trying to live it out before his age and real senility catch up on him and prevent him from carrying out his unfulfilled wish list.

His latest remarks are a mixture of all, he has often claimed he isn't senile but he creates his own senility in the statements he makes. He relishes in the sort of leadership style he carried out and if he were given the choice of being no1 again, perhaps impose the experiment he did not have a chance to implement, those unfulfilled wish lists.

The report in a local media (see below) quoting the ole sage on his preference for a commie administration over a democracy will win him support from the commies and brickbats from those who have suffered under commie rule or enjoying their democracy with the commie wolves at their gate waiting to bring forth their socialist, autocratic and often ungodly rule over the action and thoughts of every single being under the commie ideology.

India too democratic, says former Malaysian PM
Tuesday, 17 November 2009 Super Admin
(IANS) Former Malaysian prime minister Mahathir Mohamad has singled out India as an Asian country that has “made the mistake of being too democratic” and compared it unfavourably with China’s authoritarian regime.
Such an arrogant statement and must be a humiliation to the Mahatma who must be carrying on a 'heavenly' fast to prevent the Mahatma from getting mad with a Mahathir! It's really an insult to the Indians who have decided on their own the choice of a democracy over a commie ideology.

Who is he to point out the fault of India being too democratic and think that BolehLand democratic model of less democracy is a better one and to assume BolehLand fellos are all joyful and grateful to the type of democracy that the BN government is practicing and advocating?

Mahathir said: “India, of course, will grow, but more slowly than China. It has the numbers but is not making use of them well.”

He identified China, Japan, South Korea, Taiwan and, “to a lesser extent”, India as the countries which would lead the Asian charge, New Straits Times said Tuesday.

Mahathir, who ruled Malaysia for over two decades, told a seminar on Asia and 21st century that people “do not understand the limits of democracy”.

“Democracy can be a hindrance to progress because you spend so much time politicking that you don’t have time to develop your country.

“In China, there’s not much politics. So, they can spend more time developing their country.”
Yup becoz they have bludgeoned, clobbered, locked up dissents. And they send in the army, mob squad, corrupt officials who have no compunction to beat, harasses, kill, maim, imprison and suppress those who oppose their rule.

He could have invited back ex commie Chin Peng to be his no2 if he thought commie ideology will bring progress quicker to BolehLand and help him achieve his 2020 in 1990?

He blamed the West for making democracy and freedom the cornerstone of progress.
Perhaps he may care to ask the present no1 to do away with democracy and freedom and impose a commie or better still an Iranian or taliban type of administration. What about his ole fren mugabe's style? That way he can dispense off with the opposition, elections, ngos, anyone who don't follow the dictates of the ruler be done away with in the name of achieving his 2020 vision in a free reign!

It is the West’s focus on democracy, civil rights and individual liberties - attributes flaunted by Western governments - that Mahathir identified as being the reason behind “its economic flaccidity”.
Hmm, let's see if the western fellos stop buying from commie countries or exporting to them the materialist things that the commie fellos want and see if the commie economies will survive.

“The British believe a lot in so-called freedom. Their workers must be allowed to go on strike all the time. So, they have the problem of being a very unproductive population.

“They must be free of everything. When you do that, productivity will drop. When productivity drops, you cannot compete.”
Just as there are extremes in a democracy which is quite difficult to achieve, they are extremes in commie rule which is quiet easily implemented without any check or balance. The commie leaders are probably using their iron clad commie rule to enable them to check what their balance is in their account as long as they can gain material wealth without worries some democratic fello questions how he got so rich that contradicts the essence of commie ideology.

Talking about Asia, Mahathir ruled out a role for “strife-torn” West Asia.

“They are not going to make much progress, unfortunately. They are not going to contribute to the Asia of the 21st century. But it doesn’t matter because Asia is such a big place,” Mahathir said.
Yup, a big place where democratic leaders bestow commie country leaders so much respect and kow towing, than they treat their own citizens of their own countries!

East Asia’s emerging economic dominance over the West is due to its productivity and strong work ethic, he said.

However, the former premier warned of the increasing trend among young Asians to ape Western culture.

“Today, there are places in Tokyo where you see young people with multi-coloured hair. They look like Red Indians. These are the young Japanese who have adopted Western values,” said the octogenarian who continues to draw crowds six years after he quit office.
Wasn't he the one who had the 'Look East' policy not knowing the country he was trying to emulate were also looking in the easterly direction across their ocean to a western democracy called the US of A and emulated them to become an economic superpower!

“They want to be free and be able to change the place they work, hop from one place to another and take marijuana. This is what the Europeans do. This is progress for those young people.”
Maybe ole sage hasn't seen the copycat nihoen jins in urban BolehLand. If he sat long enough in his Loft, he'd think he's sitting in some bread joint in Shibuya or Shinjuku! Better have these 'red indians' enjoying their freedom and individualism than to have the moral squads PAS or JAIS fellos literally poking their nose to peek at you and smell what your are eating or drinking!

Is the ole sage trying to make history sanction and go easy on the travesties he committed while in power.

Ole sage must want to stand along the commie leaders such as Stalin, Lenin, Pol Pot, the Kims of South Korea, Castros, past Eastern European commies, uncle mao ad Chin Peng?

Or is he suggesting that autocratic anti democractic leaders such as the idi amins, mugabes, talibans, saudis, pinochets are what brings progress to their nations.

It's an insult to India to suggest that democracy is the cause of it not being materialistically better off than commie china. The fellos in China are willing to sacrifice personal freedom SO LONG AS THEY ARE ABLE TO GAIN MATERIALLY. They won't blink an eye if some peasant stood for their rights to save their land from being forcefully taken by the capitalist commie official in cohort with greedy ala commie businesses.

It would be interesting if the commie government decide to tax the materialistic chinese and take away half their wealth what they earn. Then we shall see if the chinese fellos will feel victimised and cry for justice. That will prove to ole sage if the materialistic commie fellos are happy under the commie sense of justice. After all aren't the rich supposed to have equal 'wealth'
like those not 'rich'!

It would be interesting in ole sage can ask his UMNO fellos to give up their status and wealth acquired through 'democratic' means! If they thought like ole Tun, there may not be so much of wastage, leakages and corruption in the government won't they?

BolehLand fellos are happy not to never know what it is like under a commie rule and pray God we never ever will experience one in our lifetime. Most we hope are happy with the flawed democratic system than a commie one, though seeing the kind of abuses and supposedly 'injustice' happening in BolehLand, some fellos are foolhardily to think that a commie alternative will rid the society of the ills of the 'bourgeoise' class.

Well history has shown the evils and more cons (pun intended) in a commie system over a flawed democracy.

I'd rather have a flawed democracy and suffer the consequences of my laziness than under a commie who dictates my action, thoughts, dreams and hopes!

Would BolehLand fellos want the State to direct your life and the law is enforced behind the barrel of the gun?

If ole sage think BolehLand democracy is slowing down his 2020 agenda, he may perhaps choose to stay in any commie nation or government that think democracy hinders their nation's progress.

North Korea, Zimbabwe? perhaps eh Tun? Or Iran, Afghanistan, Ethiopia, Yemen and closer to home, Myanmar?

Just becoz he has tasted and enjoyed what authoritarianism gave him doesn't make him qualified to know a commie is a better fello than a democrat?

He needs to look at the current state of BolehLand and take blame for it than to conveniently make 'democracy' the scapegoat for the ills that has befallen BolehLand today.

I'd rather choose democracy and its warts and what not than any commie ideology that will give me the warts and pain Tun.